The Health Conditions Most Likely to Lead to a TPD Claim in Australia
- Apr 21
- 18 min read
Written by Christopher Hall, AdvDipFP | Authorised Representative, AFSL 526688 | April 2026
Last updated: April 2026 The conditions most likely to end a working career — and trigger a TPD insurance claim — are musculoskeletal disease, mental and behavioural conditions, and diseases of the nervous system. Together they account for 53% of TPD claims paid in Australia. According to the ABS 2022 National Health Survey, these same three categories are already present in approximately one in four to one in three working-age Australians between 35 and 54.
That is not a coincidence. It is a data alignment that most Australians — and most insurance policyholders — have never seen presented side by side.
This article draws on the ABS National Health Survey 2022, APRA's Life Insurance Claims and Disputes Statistics, and TAL's published TPD claims data to show which conditions most commonly lead to a TPD claim, how prevalent those conditions already are in the working-age population, and why the definition your policy uses determines whether it would actually pay. As a licensed life insurance adviser who has reviewed more than 500 policies, I can tell you that the gap between what clients assume their cover does and what it would actually pay is wider than most realise.
For context on broader changes occurring across the Australian life insurance industry, including recent insurer developments affecting TPD underwriting, the industry news hub is updated regularly.
What Is TPD Insurance — and What Does It Actually Cover?
TPD insurance pays a lump sum if you become totally and permanently disabled and cannot return to work — but whether it pays depends almost entirely on which definition your policy uses.
There are two definitions in common use across the Australian market:
Own occupation pays a claim if you cannot perform the core duties of your specific pre-disability occupation — regardless of whether you could work in a different capacity. A surgeon with a hand tremor, for example, may be unable to continue surgery but could theoretically work in medical administration. Under own occupation, the claim is paid based on their inability to perform their specific role.
Any occupation sets a materially higher threshold. It only pays if you cannot work in any role suited to your education, training and experience. Under this definition, the surgeon in the example above may be denied — because they could still work in a different medical capacity.
The distinction matters enormously in practice, and for the conditions that most commonly drive TPD claims, own occupation consistently produces better outcomes.
One structural reality that many policyholders are unaware of: own occupation TPD is generally not available inside superannuation for policies issued after 1 July 2014, under the terms of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act. Default super fund cover almost universally uses an any occupation definition — and most members have never been told this.
According to APRA's Life Insurance Claims and Disputes Statistics (October 2025 release), TPD has the lowest claims acceptance rate of all cover types at 82.9%, compared to 97.2% for death cover and 94.4% for income protection. The definition is a primary reason.
For a detailed comparison of how these definitions work in practice, see the guide to own occupation vs any occupation TPD insurance. For a broader overview of TPD cover in Australia, the TPD insurance explained article covers the fundamentals.
What Conditions Are Most Commonly Behind TPD Insurance Claims in Australia?
Mental and behavioural disorders are the single largest cause of TPD insurance claims in Australia at 25% — followed by musculoskeletal and connective tissue conditions at 14% and diseases of the nervous system at 14%.
The table below draws on TAL's published claims data for the 2024–25 financial year. TAL is Australia's leading life insurer by inforce premiums, and their Accelerated Protection product data is the most comprehensive publicly available breakdown of TPD claim causes in the Australian market.
TPD Claims by Condition Category — Australia
Condition Category | Share of TPD Claims |
Mental and behavioural disorders | 25% |
Injury and fractures | 16% |
Other | 18% |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue | 14% |
Conditions of the nervous system | 14% |
Cancer | 13% |
Source: TAL Life Limited — Your guide to Total and Permanent Disability insurance, Accelerated Protection (TALR7560/1225, December 2025). Claims statistics based on total claims paid under TPD Insurance Accelerated Protection products, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025.
The age profile of TPD claimants is equally instructive. Of all TPD claims paid by TAL in 2024–25:
12% were for claimants under 35
34% were for claimants aged 36–45
36% were for claimants aged 46–55
17% were for claimants aged 56–65
1% were over 65
Seven in ten TPD claims are made by people between 36 and 55. This is not retirement age. This is the peak earning, peak mortgage, and peak family financial responsibility cohort — the people for whom a disability event has the most severe financial consequences, and for whom adequate, correctly defined cover is most critical.
APRA data also shows that TPD claims take an average of 7.5 months to finalise — nearly five times longer than a death claim (1.3 months). This reflects the complexity of disability assessments and the volume of medical evidence required, which underlines the importance of having the right cover structure in place before a claim arises, rather than discovering a gap during the process.
If you are concerned about the super fund TPD coverage gap and whether default cover would actually pay for these conditions, that article examines the issue in detail.
What Does the ABS National Health Survey Show About Australians in Their 30s and 40s?
The ABS 2022 National Health Survey reveals that musculoskeletal conditions already affect 27.5% of Australians aged 35–44, mental and behavioural conditions affect 27.1% of the same group, and diseases of the nervous system affect 11.1% — the same three categories that collectively drive 53% of TPD insurance claims.
The National Health Survey is the most comprehensive and authoritative source of population health data in Australia, conducted by the Australian Bureau of Statistics and released in December 2023. An update published in April 2026 added suburb-level estimates for the first time, revealing significant variation in chronic disease and risk factor prevalence across Australian communities.
The table below shows the proportion of Australians across three working-age bands who carry a diagnosed long-term health condition in each of the key categories.
ABS NHS 2022: Condition Prevalence in Working-Age Australians (%)
Condition | Age 25–34 | Age 35–44 | Age 45–54 |
Mental & behavioural conditions (total) | 30.9% | 27.1% | 28.7% |
— Anxiety-related disorders | 24.4% | 20.4% | 22.2% |
— Mood disorders incl. depression | 14.7% | 14.3% | 17.0% |
Musculoskeletal conditions (total) | 18.4% | 27.5% | 34.6% |
— Back problems | 12.8% | 18.9% | 20.3% |
— Arthritis (total) | 3.3% | 6.4% | 16.2% |
Diseases of the nervous system (total) | 11.4% | 11.1% | 12.9% |
Diabetes (total) | 1.3% | 2.6% | 6.0% |
Heart, stroke & vascular disease (total) | 1.0% | 1.2% | 4.3% |
— Hypertension (self-reported) | 1.6% | 4.7% | 12.4% |
Cancer (total malignant neoplasms) | 0.3% | 0.5% | 0.5% |
Asthma | 9.9% | 12.9% | 12.0% |
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, National Health Survey 2022, Table 3.3 — Long-term health conditions by age, All Persons, Proportion. Released 15 December 2023.
What these numbers show, read alongside the claims data, is not a coincidence — it is a pattern. The conditions most prevalent in the working-age cohort are the same conditions most frequently triggering TPD claims. Nearly 1 in 3 Australians in their late 20s and 30s already reports a mental or behavioural condition. More than 1 in 4 Australians aged 35–44 has a musculoskeletal condition, rising to more than 1 in 3 by age 45–54. Back problems alone affect nearly 1 in 5 Australians in their late 30s and early 40s.
The ABS data also captures the upstream risk factor profile that compounds these conditions over time. Across all Australian adults aged 18 and over: 75.2% do not meet physical activity guidelines, 65.8% are overweight or obese, and 23.3% have measured high blood pressure. These are the risk factors that insurers assess at application — and they help explain why underwriting for life and TPD insurance has become more thorough over the past decade.
"In more than 500 policy reviews, the conditions I encounter most often as existing diagnosed health history — back problems, anxiety, and depression — are the same conditions that most commonly result in a TPD claim. The prevalence the ABS data shows is entirely consistent with what I see across the policies I review." — Christopher Hall, Arrow Equities (C. Hall, Arrow Equities, 500+ policy reviews, 2026)
Own Occupation vs Any Occupation: Why the Definition Matters When These Conditions Strike
For many Australians — particularly tradespeople and skilled professionals — the conditions most likely to trigger a TPD claim are precisely the ones that any occupation definitions most commonly fail to pay on.
"The scenario I see most often is a tradesperson — electrician, plumber, carpenter — who has developed a back or musculoskeletal condition. On paper, they could theoretically do sedentary work. Under an any occupation definition, that argument is enough to deny the claim: they can still work, just not in the trade they've spent 20 years building. Under an own occupation definition, the outcome is completely different. They cannot perform the core duties of their occupation and the claim is paid. Most tradespeople I review have no idea which definition they hold — and for this cohort, it may be the most important financial question they've never been asked." — Christopher Hall, AdvDipFP | Arrow Equities (C. Hall, Arrow Equities, 500+ policy reviews, 2026)
The same logic applies to anyone in an occupation with specific physical, cognitive, or clinical requirements. A nurse who develops a chronic musculoskeletal condition may be prevented from returning to clinical work — but could theoretically work in a non-clinical administrative role. Under any occupation, that argument may be used to deny the claim. Under own occupation, the assessment focuses on whether they can perform the duties of their nursing role.
This distinction is not theoretical. It plays out across the conditions the ABS data identifies as most prevalent in the 35–54 cohort — and it is why own occupation cover is generally considered appropriate for tradespeople, healthcare professionals, and anyone in a role with specific physical or specialised cognitive demands.
For a complete breakdown of how these two definitions apply across different occupation types, the complete guide to TPD insurance in Australia covers each scenario in detail.
How Getting Your Occupation Category Right Can Affect Both Your Cover and Your Premium
Beyond the own vs any occupation distinction, how your occupation is classified by an insurer — and how accurately your duties are recorded — can directly affect your premium and, in some cases, unlock discounts that a direct application would miss entirely.
"Nurses are one of the clearest examples I work with. They understand what TPD insurance is for, often better than any other client group — they've watched colleagues be unable to return to clinical work after illness or injury, and they know exactly what that means financially. But getting cover as a nurse is expensive, because the industry understands the risk too. The work we do as advisers is twofold: first, making sure the occupation category recorded with the insurer accurately reflects the actual duties — not just a generic job title — and second, identifying every eligible discount to make the premium as manageable as possible. That categorisation work isn't a one-time fix. As a nurse's role changes — shift work, specialisation, management responsibilities — the classification and the associated premium should be reviewed. That's where the ongoing relationship with an adviser adds real value." — Christopher Hall, AdvDipFP | Arrow Equities (C. Hall, Arrow Equities, 500+ policy reviews, 2026)
Each of the nine major insurers Arrow Equities works with — TAL, AIA, ClearView, Zurich, MetLife, OnePath, NEOS, PPS Mutual, and Encompass — uses a different occupation classification framework. A role described as "health worker" at one insurer may attract a different premium category, and different underwriting terms, than the same role accurately classified under a specialised clinical category at another.
This variation is not visible when applying directly. It requires an adviser who works across the panel and knows where each occupation type is most favourably positioned. The same principle applies to tradespeople, allied health professionals, and anyone in an occupation where job duties change over time — a move from on-tools work to a supervisory or management role, for example, can change the applicable classification and potentially the premium.
An insurance premium review that accurately captures current duties and reassesses occupation classification is the mechanism for managing this over the life of a policy. For more on how that process works, see the insurance premium review guide and the explanation of when to review your life insurance.
Why Default Super Fund TPD Cover Is Often Insufficient for the Conditions That Most Commonly Cause Claims
Default TPD cover inside superannuation uses an any occupation definition — the definition that fails most readily for the exact conditions, and the exact occupations, most commonly involved in TPD claims.
The structural reason for this is the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993, which effectively prohibits own occupation TPD definitions inside superannuation for new policies issued after 1 July 2014. Default cover is group-rated and not tailored to occupation type — a tradesperson and a desk worker may hold the same definition inside their super fund, despite the former being significantly more exposed to the conditions driving TPD claims.
According to PPS Mutual, over 90% of TPD claims in Australia are for cover held through superannuation. This means the majority of TPD claimants are assessed against an any occupation standard — regardless of whether that definition is appropriate for their occupation.
The practical consequence is illustrated by a finding that appears across reviews: a super fund statement may show a substantial TPD benefit — $300,000, $500,000 — but the actual payable amount, under the applicable definition, waiting period, and policy structure, can be materially lower than that figure suggests. Without reviewing the policy documents rather than the statement, that gap is invisible.
Rice Warner's Underinsurance in Australia report (2020) estimated the annual cost to the Australian Government of death and TPD underinsurance — measured in additional social security payments — at more than $600 million per year. APRA data shows that Australians pay more than $6 billion annually for insurance held inside superannuation. The cost is significant; the cover delivered is not always commensurate.
For a detailed analysis of how super fund TPD cover is structured and where the gaps most commonly appear, see life insurance inside super: is it enough? and the TPD insurance super fund coverage gap article. For information on tax treatment of a TPD payout depending on whether it is held inside or outside super, the TPD insurance payout and tax guide covers this clearly.
Not sure which TPD definition your policy holds — or whether it matches your occupation and health profile?
Christopher Hall reviews policies for Australian families at no cost, drawing on 500+ reviews across TAL, AIA, ClearView, Zurich, MetLife, OnePath, NEOS, PPS Mutual and Encompass.
Mental Health Is the Leading Cause of TPD Claims — Here's What That Means for Your Cover
Mental and behavioural disorders are the single largest category of TPD insurance claims in Australia at 25% — and the ABS data shows that nearly 1 in 3 working-age Australians already lives with a diagnosed mental or behavioural condition.
For Australians aged 25–34, the ABS 2022 National Health Survey found that 30.9% carry a diagnosed mental or behavioural condition — with anxiety-related disorders affecting 24.4% and mood disorders (including depression) affecting 14.7%. In the 35–44 cohort, those figures are 27.1%, 20.4%, and 14.3% respectively. These are not marginal statistics. They describe the health profile of the population that is currently most reliant on TPD insurance.
The insurance industry has responded with a significant market signal. In October 2025, Swiss Re — one of Australia's major TPD reinsurers — announced it was pausing new business activities in the Australian TPD market. The decision was framed explicitly around long-term sustainability. Swiss Re's announcement cited the Council of Australian Life Insurers' (CALI) finding that Australian insurers paid more than $2.2 billion in mental health-related TPD claims in 2024 — nearly double the amount from five years earlier — describing this growth as "creating significant strain on Australia's financial system" (Swiss Re, media release, 23 October 2025). Swiss Re confirmed it would continue supporting existing retail life insurance company partners but would not seek new insurer clients "until the market demonstrates a clear shift to sustainable product design." Industry commentary following the announcement made clear this was not an isolated position: at the Zurich Sustainability Round Table in 2026, David Creaven, Head of Client Partnerships at SCOR Australia & New Zealand, stated that the issue of sustainability across TPD "is something that a number of reinsurers and direct insurers have been agitating for." The TPD mental health claims analysis covers this in more detail, including what the Swiss Re pause means for existing policyholders.
From an underwriting perspective, mental health history is now one of the most closely examined areas of a TPD application. The circumstances of any mental health treatment matter as much as the fact of it — a person who attended counselling sessions under a court-arranged arrangement during divorce proceedings three years ago faces a very different assessment than someone with ongoing psychiatric treatment. An exclusion applied during underwriting does not have to be permanent; in some circumstances it can be reassessed after a defined period. This is adviser-level knowledge that does not transfer through a direct application.
For the conditions driving mental health TPD claims specifically, own occupation cover provides meaningfully better outcomes than any occupation cover. A professional who develops a serious depressive or anxiety condition that prevents them from returning to their specific role may satisfy the own occupation test but not the any occupation test — because they could theoretically perform lower-demand work. For nurses, paramedics, and other clinical professionals this distinction is especially consequential.
The latest developments across the Australian life insurance industry news hub are updated regularly as the market continues to respond to mental health claims trends.
What the ABS Health Data Means for Your TPD Insurance in 2026
The conditions most likely to end a working career are not theoretical future risks — the ABS data shows they are already present in a significant proportion of working-age Australians, and the question is whether your current TPD policy would actually pay if they affected you.
Three questions are worth checking now:
1. Is your TPD definition own occupation or any occupation? This is the single most important question for tradespeople, healthcare workers, and anyone in a physically or cognitively specialised role. If your cover is held inside super, the answer is almost certainly any occupation.
2. Is your cover held inside super, outside super, or in a hybrid structure? Inside super means any occupation only, regardless of your occupation. Outside super allows own occupation cover. A hybrid structure — any occupation inside super supplemented by own occupation outside — is one way to access the benefits of both, managed by an adviser across the insurer panel.
3. Has your occupation category been accurately recorded — and reviewed since your role last changed? Occupation classification affects both the definition available and the premium. A role change — clinical to management, on-tools to supervisory — can change your classification. This is not automatic. It requires a review.
"In 500+ policy reviews, the most consistent finding is that clients believe they have adequate TPD cover because the number on their super statement looks large. The definition and the structure are almost never checked. For tradespeople and anyone in a physically or cognitively demanding occupation, that untested assumption carries real financial risk." — Christopher Hall (C. Hall, Arrow Equities, 500+ policy reviews, 2026)
For more on identifying gaps in existing cover, common insurance coverage gaps Australian families don't know they have covers the most frequent findings from policy reviews. For an explanation of what a professional review involves and what it produces, how a professional life insurance review works sets out the process clearly.
Frequently Asked Questions: TPD Insurance and Health Conditions in Australia
What conditions are most commonly behind TPD insurance claims in Australia?
Mental and behavioural disorders account for 25% of TPD claims, followed by injury and fractures (16%), musculoskeletal and connective tissue conditions (14%), diseases of the nervous system (14%), and cancer (13%). These figures are drawn from TAL's Accelerated Protection claims data for the period 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025. TAL is Australia's leading life insurer by inforce premiums, making this data the most comprehensive publicly available breakdown of TPD claim causes in the market.
Is mental health covered by TPD insurance in Australia?
Yes — mental and behavioural disorders are the single largest category of TPD claims at 25%. Whether a specific claim is paid depends on the policy definition (own vs any occupation), whether a mental health exclusion was applied during underwriting, and whether the condition prevents the claimant from satisfying the applicable disability test. Own occupation policies generally produce better claim outcomes for mental health conditions than any occupation policies.
Does super fund TPD cover mental illness?
Most super fund default TPD uses an any occupation definition, which requires the claimant to demonstrate they cannot work in any role suited to their education, training and experience — a higher threshold than own occupation. In October 2025, Swiss Re paused new TPD business activities in Australia, citing the long-term sustainability of TPD insurance as the primary reason — particularly the rapid growth of mental health-related claims, which the Council of Australian Life Insurers (CALI) reported reached $2.2 billion in 2024, nearly double the amount from five years earlier (Swiss Re, media release, 23 October 2025; CALI, 2025). Super fund members should confirm which definition their fund uses and whether any mental health exclusion applies to their default cover.
What is the difference between own occupation and any occupation TPD?
Own occupation TPD pays if you cannot perform the core duties of your specific pre-disability job, regardless of whether you could do other work. Any occupation TPD only pays if you cannot work in any capacity suited to your education, training and experience. Own occupation is generally not available inside superannuation for policies issued after 1 July 2014, under the terms of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993.
How does my occupation affect my TPD insurance?
Occupation affects both your risk classification and your premium. Each insurer classifies occupations differently — a role described generically may attract different underwriting terms than the same role accurately classified under a specialised category. Occupation classification also determines which definition is available and which insurer is most competitive for your specific role. An adviser working across multiple insurers can identify where your occupation is best positioned and ensure your duties are accurately recorded.
Is life insurance more expensive for nurses in Australia?
Yes — nursing is classified as a higher-risk occupation by most Australian life insurers, reflecting the physical and psychological demands of clinical work and the elevated prevalence of musculoskeletal and mental health conditions in the profession. The premium loading varies by insurer, by nursing specialty, and by how accurately the clinical duties are described. Advisers who regularly work with nurses know which insurers offer the most competitive terms for clinical roles and which premium discounts — professional association membership, non-smoker status, and others — are available to reduce the effective cost.
How common are musculoskeletal conditions in Australia?
According to the ABS 2022 National Health Survey, musculoskeletal conditions affect 18.4% of Australians aged 25–34, 27.5% of those aged 35–44, and 34.6% of those aged 45–54. Back problems alone affect 12.8% of 25–34 year olds, rising to 18.9% in the 35–44 group and 20.3% in the 45–54 group. Musculoskeletal and connective tissue conditions account for 14% of TPD insurance claims paid in Australia.
What percentage of TPD insurance claims are accepted in Australia?
According to APRA's Life Insurance Claims and Disputes Statistics (October 2025 release), advised TPD policies have an acceptance rate of 82.9% — the lowest of all cover types. Death cover achieves 97.2%, income protection 94.4%, and trauma 86.6%. The lower TPD acceptance rate reflects both the complexity of disability assessments and the role that definition type plays in determining whether a claim meets the policy threshold.
The ABS Data Used in This Article
The condition prevalence statistics in this article are drawn directly from the ABS National Health Survey 2022 datacubes, specifically Table 3 (Long-term health conditions by age and sex) and Table 6 (Health risk factors by population characteristics), released by the Australian Bureau of Statistics on 15 December 2023. The April 2026 update added small area estimates at the SA2 (suburb) level for the first time.
Sources and Bibliography
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2023). National Health Survey, 2022 — Table 3: Long-term health conditions by age and sex. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra. Released 15 December 2023; updated 13 April 2026.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2023). National Health Survey, 2022 — Table 6: Health risk factors by population characteristics. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra. Released 15 December 2023.
TAL Life Limited (2025). Your guide to Total and Permanent Disability insurance — Accelerated Protection (TALR7560/1225). TAL Life Limited ABN 70 050 109 450, AFSL 237848. December 2025. Claims statistics based on total claims paid under TPD Insurance Accelerated Protection products, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025.
Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (2025). Life Insurance Claims and Disputes Statistics — October 2025 Release. APRA, Sydney.
Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (2023). Life Insurance Claims and Disputes Statistics — 2022–23. APRA, Sydney.
PPS Mutual (2022). How to avoid the traps in TPD claims through super. Published 24 October 2022. ppsmutual.com.au
Rice Warner (2020). Underinsurance in Australia, 2020. Rice Warner Actuaries, Sydney.
ASIC MoneySmart (current). Total and permanent disability (TPD) insurance. Australian Securities and Investments Commission. moneysmart.gov.au
NMG Consulting (2023). Market share data — inforce premiums, risk-only life insurance policies, Australia. Cited via TAL Life Limited.
Hall, C. (2026). Observations from 500+ life insurance policy reviews. Arrow Equities (Rose Bay Equities Pty Ltd), AFSL 526688, ABN 87 645 284 680, Rose Bay NSW 2029.
Super Consumers Australia (2024). Submission to APRA Insurance Data Transformation project. Super Consumers Australia.
Swiss Re (2025). Media release — Swiss Re pauses new TPD business activities in Australia. Swiss Re Life & Health Australia. Published 23 October 2025.
Council of Australian Life Insurers / CALI (2025). Mental health-related TPD claims data, 2024. Cited in Swiss Re media release, 23 October 2025. Council of Australian Life Insurers, Sydney.
Creaven, D. (2026). Commentary on TPD sustainability. Presented at Zurich Sustainability Round Table, 2026. David Creaven, Head of Client Partnerships, SCOR Australia & New Zealand.
AIA Australia (2022). TPD: Inside or Outside Superannuation or Both? AIA Australia Limited ABN 79 004 837 861, AFSL 230043. July 2022. aia.com.au
Book a Free TPD Policy Review
The ABS data, the APRA claims statistics, and more than 500 policy reviews point to the same conclusion: the conditions most likely to end a working career are more prevalent, and arrive earlier, than most Australians assume. The right TPD cover — the right definition, the right occupation classification, the right structure — is what converts a health event into financial security rather than a financial crisis.
Christopher Hall has reviewed policies across TAL, AIA, ClearView, Zurich, MetLife, OnePath, NEOS, PPS Mutual and Encompass for more than 500 Australian families. The review is free and takes under 30 minutes to begin.
Educational Disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
The information, opinions and other materials appearing on the Web Site are of a general nature only and shall not be construed as advice. Arrow Equities, AFSL 526688, ABN 87 645 284 680. This general information is educational only and not financial advice, recommendation, forecast or solicitation. Rose Bay Equities accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the information, opinions or other materials provided on or accessible through the Web Site. The Web Site has not been prepared with reference to your individual financial or personal circumstances. You should not rely on any advice in this Web Site without first seeking appropriate professional, financial and legal advice. Further, where Rose Bay Equities makes third party material available or accessible through the Web Site you acknowledge that Rose Bay Equities is a distributor and not a publisher of that content and that its editorial control is limited to the selection of those materials to make available. We accept no liability for any loss or damages arising from use.
Comments